Categories
Uncategorized

Tesla after two year

After driving an EV for two years there are a number of key takeaways:

  1. Electric car charging infrastructure is getting really good
  2. The range is improving and should serve most people’s daily/yearly needs
  3. Price is coming down and the money saved on maintenance and fuel adds up
  4. Tesla is more of a software company and that sets it apart, they sell a computer/gaming console on wheels
  5. It’s hard to find a better value for FUN in a car
Categories
energy

Why Solar?

A lot of folks are thinking about solar but they are framing the problem the wrong way. The thought process is usually focused on the financials and most solar companies are selling solar based on the fiscal benefits.

Yes. There are financial benefits and yes, solar can cost quite a bit in terms of up-front investment so this is a consideration but this shouldn’t be the WHY. If you’re starting with a financial argument you’ll end up having a weak argument.

If you want a greater % of your energy to come from natural sources, solar is often the only way to take control.

Current New England energy sources for grid-based energy. Source ISO-NE

New England currently gets 7% of its energy from renewables, of that only a small percentage is solar. While natural gas is 50-60% better than coal in terms of carbon emissions it’s still not very clean. If your WHY is to reduce your carbon footprint then solar is a really good solution.

Taking ownership of your energy production is both easy and cost-effective way to positively reduce total carbon emissions while also having nice finance side-effects.

Categories
innovation

Getting Good at Anything

The key to getting good at anything is to start by being bad at it. For anyone who has high-standards, this is really difficult because you’re producing something that you are not happy with. That’s exactly the point. You know it’s not good enough, you know it should be better but your skills don’t match your expectations.

This is when many people give up and this is the opportunity for those that push through.

For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit… It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions.”

― Ira Glass
Categories
innovation

40-hour “work” week

Maximize the value delivered, not the hours

How many hours, is the right number of hours to work each week? Some entrepreneurs are talking about four-hour work while others are telling you to always-be-hustling.

If you’re asking 40-hours or 130-hours, you’re asking the wrong question. It doesn’t matter. I’d rather work with someone who produces results in 30 hours than someone who works all day but doesn’t produce results.

If you’re starting a business there are times when going the extra mile can make a huge difference but I think it’s rarely about the hours, it’s about the impact that those hours can have.

When starting a business there are always too many things to do and adding hours can sometimes feel like the right way to increase your productivity. There are times when this can be effective but it’s a losing long-term strategy.

As hours increase the value of the work delivered in each hour tends to go down. It can work for short bursts but is likely to burn people out.

Companies that consistently miss dates and deadlines are systemically dysfunctional. Running a business is a marathon, not a sprint and running people too hard is a recipe for disaster.

When I worked at Microsoft, I would often work late and the company would regularly order dinner for the team. It was hugely problematic but at the time, it didn’t feel broken because the work energized me. What I didn’t understand was that I was paying the price the following day when I would wake up groggy and sleep-deprived. I’m sure the company thought they were maximizing hours but they were draining the creativity dry.

It wasn’t about the hours, it was about driving the results.

Most technology jobs are unlike manufacturing jobs. With a manufacturing job, the more you work, the more things you can make. If you produce 100 widgets an hour, it’s math to know how many you can produce if you run the factory 24×7. The same math doesn’t hold true for software or similar creative work.

Elon Musk, sleeping at the Tesla factory, to keep it running all night and Marissa Mayer working 130 hours a week isn’t the same thing.

With a technology job, the more you work… Yeah. The more you work. It’s not about hours, it’s about results. The entire notion of hourly work is flawed, especially when you’re doing anything creative.

Many years ago I discovered a methodology called ROWE. This stands for Results-Only Work Environment. The idea behind ROWE is that it’s about the results, not the hours and employees should be empowered and measured on results, not attendance, hours, vacation or other abstract metrics.

If you’re focused on results, you’re more likely to empower your team to actually drive change in the business while giving people the health, wellness, and balance that they need to achieve it.